Megan F. Nogle

Counsel
Fax 310-201-2324

Bill Proposed In California Legislature Would Tax Transfer Of Wealth Over $3.5 Million

March 29, 2019Client Alert
Greenberg Glusker Client Alert

Earlier this week, amended SB-378 was introduced in the California Legislature providing for the reinstatement of an estate tax and the imposition of a new gift and generation-skipping transfer tax (collectively, “Transfer Taxes”) on California residents beginning January 1, 2021.

Currently, there are no California Transfer Taxes payable by a California resident or by a non-resident who owns property in California.

The bill follows the structure and rules of the federal Transfer Taxes, but with significantly lower exclusion amounts. The revenue generated by the California Transfer Taxes could be as much as $1 Billion annually, all of which would be deposited into a Children’s Wealth and Opportunity Building Fund, funding programs and services that directly address and alleviate socio-economic inequality and creating “California Social Inheritance Accounts to counterbalance the uneven effects of intergenerational wealth transfer.”

How, When and To Whom Would This Apply?

Under SB-378, a 40% tax – the same rate as the current rate for federal Transfer Taxes – would be imposed on gifts by California residents made on and after January 1, 2021, and on estates of California residents dying on or after January 1, 2021. SB-378 provides an exclusion from the California Transfer Taxes, applied to cumulative lifetime gifts and transfers at death, of $3.5 Million with no inflation adjustment. In contrast, under the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the current exclusion from federal Transfer Taxes is $10 Million, adjusted for inflation – the inflation-adjusted amount is $11.4 Million in 2019 – and will return to $5 Million, adjusted for inflation, beginning January 1, 2026.

SB-378 provides a credit against the California Transfer Taxes for federal Transfer Taxes paid. As a result, California Transfer Taxes would be payable only on the value of the transfer in excess of the $3.5 Million California exclusion amount up to the value of the federal exclusion amount then in effect. Transfers in excess of the federal exclusion would only give rise to the payment of federal Transfer Taxes. Thus, for example, based upon current federal law, a transfer of $11.4 Million that generates no federal Transfer Taxes would exceed the California exclusion amount by $7.9 Million and give rise to California Transfer Taxes of $3.16 Million.

In addition to the imposition of California Transfer Taxes, SB-378 would impose filing and compliance requirements to report the California Transfer Taxes.

How Might SB-378 Become Law?

A 1982 California voter initiative prohibits the imposition of a California estate tax absent approval of the voters. Thus, even if SB-378 passes the California Legislature and is signed by Governor Newsom, it must still be approved by a majority of California voters before taking effect. SB-378 calls for a special election to be held concurrent with the next statewide general election in 2020 to obtain that voter approval. Only if SB-378 passes the California Legislature, is signed by Governor Newsom and approved by a majority of California voters would it take effect on January 1, 2021.

Open Questions And Planning Considerations

There is a long road before SB-378 would become law and many questions to be answered before then. For example:

  • Clarification will be needed to determine who is a “resident” of California for purposes of California Transfer Taxes – will the determination be made in the same manner as for income tax residency or will there be a separate test?
     
  • The bill appears to impose California Transfer Taxes only on California residents – how (or will) California Transfer Taxes be applied to a California non-resident who owns property in California?
     
  • If a California resident taxpayer makes gifts before January 1, 2021, and then transfers an additional $3.5 Million after that date, will the California Transfer Taxes be based upon the cumulative value transferred or based only upon transfers after January 1, 2021?

The answers to these and other questions could lead California residents, already weary of high income taxes, to take steps to establish and solidify residency outside of California before the California Transfer Taxes would be imposed, also raising the question of whether a “look back” period would apply for individuals who become California non-residents to avoid the California Transfer Taxes. Alternatively, the potential for a new California gift tax may lead California residents to consider accelerating their lifetime gift planning using the federal exclusion by making gifts before the California Transfer Taxes would take effect on January 1, 2021.

For more information on how this proposed bill could impact you, please contact a member of Greenberg Glusker’s Private Client Services Group:

© 2019 Greenberg Glusker Fields Claman & Machtinger LLP. All rights reserved. This Client Alert contains information of a general nature that is not intended to be legal advice. Should you wish to rely on the information transmitted, please contact a legal professional first. Providing this Client Alert does not create an attorney-client relationship with the recipient. Greenberg Glusker Fields Claman & Machtinger LLP (the “Firm”) does not represent or warrant that this Client Alert contains information that is true or accurate in all respects or that is the most current or complete information on the subject matter covered. You have received this Client Alert because of our belief that you may have an existing business relationship with the Firm or have indicated a desire to receive such communications. This bulletin may constitute attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Resources