Category: Prop 65
Judicial Burn: Court Declares Proposition 65 Acrylamide Warning Unconstitutional
Acrylamide, a Proposition 65-listed substance that naturally forms in the cooking and heating of many plant-based foods, has been the focus of court action over the past six years. However, companies will no longer be required to warn for dietary acrylamide exposures pursuant to a ruling of a California federal...
California Proposition 65: Approved Changes Overhaul Safe Harbor Warnings
On December 6, 2024, the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA), the lead California regulatory agency tasked with implementing California’s Proposition 65, issued a notice stating that the Office of Administrative Law approved changes to the Prop 65 “clear and reasonable warnings” regulations originally proposed by OEHHA in...
Prop. 65 Halloween Special: More Tricks than Treats for California Restaurants
It’s been more tricks than treats this season for restaurants located in California. In the past few weeks, there have been over 100 California Proposition 65 60-day notices of intent to sue issued on behalf of claimant Golden State Consumer Law Group, Inc. for the alleged failure to warn...
Finalized Acrylamide Warnings and Related Legal Showdown
This week, the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) announced that the proposed Prop. 65 additional safe harbor warning options for acrylamide have become final. The safe harbor options will be included in Title 27, California Code of Regulations 25607.2(b), and are set to take effect on January...
California Prop 65 Suit Targets PFAS in Feminine Care Products
On Monday, consumer group, Ecological Alliance, LLC, filed a lawsuit against the makers of the Carefree brand of menstrual liners, Edgewell Personal Care Brands, LLC , alleging that the liners contained perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), one of the per – and polyfluoralkyl substances (PFAS) chemicals on the California Proposition 65...
Will Makeup Get a Makeover? Titanium Dioxide in Cosmetics
UPDATE : On June 12, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California entered a preliminary injunction in The Personal Care Products Council v. Bonta . The order provides, in pertinent part, “Defendant, his officers, employees, and agents, and all those acting in privity or concert with...
California's Climate Disclosure Mandates Face Legal Challenges
In a landmark legal challenge, a coalition led by prominent business federations is challenging California's pioneering climate disclosure laws, Senate Bill 253 (the Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act) and Senate Bill 261 (the Climate-Related Financial Risk Act). These regulations mandate unprecedented disclosure of climate-related financial risks and greenhouse gas emissions...
What to Know About the Recent OEHHA Hearings
The California Proposition 65 short-form warning saga continues. We authored articles in both Bloomberg Law and Corporate Compliance Insights to discuss what businesses should know from the recent California Environmental Protection Agency's Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) hearings. California's Proposition 65 short-form warning changes proposed by OEHHA could significantly affect...
OEHHA Proposes Sweeping Changes to California’s Proposition 65 Warning Requirements
On October 27, 2023, the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA), the lead California regulatory agency tasked with implementing California’s Proposition 65, proposed significant changes to the Proposition 65 warning requirements that may impact businesses’ Proposition 65 compliance strategy. In particular, OEHHA is once again considering changes to the...
U.S. Supreme Court Declines to Review Decision Blocking Prop. 65 Acrylamide Cancer Lawsuits
For those following the acrylamide saga (see, e.g., our earlier blog post ), on Monday of this week, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to review the injunction blocking new Prop. 65 lawsuits as to cancer warning labels on foods containing acrylamide: By way of background, Prop. 65 requires businesses...
California’s Supreme Court Opens Gates to Prop. 65 Lawsuits Against Amazon.com
Last month, the California Supreme Court created some e-commerce waves when it declined to review a Court of Appeals decision allowing California Proposition 65 (“Prop. 65”) lawsuits against retail giant Amazon.com. The decision arguably allows customers to sue Amazon.com and similar e-commerce companies for failing to warn buyers that products...
Who is Subject to California's Proposition 65 Warning Requirements?
Environmental Law Partner, Sedina Banks, presented a webinar "California’s Proposition 65: Background, Compliance, and Strategy" to members of the Association of Corporate Counsel - Southern California and the International Society of Primerus Law Firms. In this video clip, she discusses who is subject to California’s Proposition 65 warning requirements.
Back to School for Administrators: New K-6 Ban List and Laws Regulating Art Supplies
As schools reopen and in-person learning resumes, school teachers and administrators should be aware of laws regulating the purchasing of art supplies in schools. A preview of some of these laws is as follows: The California Education Code (Cal. Education Code § 32064, et seq. ) prohibits the purchase...
The Ever-Shifting Landscape of Prop 65 Acrylamide Regulation
It has thus far been a noteworthy year for acrylamide, a Proposition 65-listed substance that naturally forms in the cooking and heating of many plant-based foods. Both the courts and the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (“OEHHA,” the agency tasked with enforcing Proposition 65’s warning requirements) appear to be...
Even Your Parking Structure Violates Prop 65
The Prop 65 “Clear and Reasonable Warnings” updates that became effective in August 2018 contain lots of traps for the unwary, including one that you might not have noticed: tailored Prop 65 warnings are required at each of the public entrances to your enclosed parking facilities. To avail your regulated...
